From: Paul Brown <paul@PAUL-BROWN.COM>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:07:55 +0100
From: Roger Malina We are pleased to announce the final plans and program for the Refresh! conference, co-sponsored by Leonardo/ISAST. Call to all interested to attend the first Refresh! conference on the Histories of the New Media Arts, Sciences and Technologies which will be held at the Banff New Media Institute. Conference dates: September 28 - October 1, 2005 Recognizing the increasing significance of media art for our culture, this conference on the histories of media art will discuss, for the first time, the history of media art within the interdisciplinary and intercultural contexts of the histories of art. Leonardo/ISAST, Banff New Media Institute, the Database for Virtual Art, and UNESCO DigiArts are collaborating to produce the first international art history conference covering art and new media, art and technology, art-science interaction, and the history of media as pertinent to contemporary art. Selected speakers include: Oliver Grau: Refresh! Conference Director; Lecturer in Art History at Humboldt University, Berlin; Visiting Professor at the Kunst Universaet Linz; Lucia Santanella, Professor of Communication and Semiotics, São Paulo Catholic University, Brazil; and Edmond Couchot: Theoretician, and Emeritus Professor, the Université de Paris. For more information about Refresh!, the final program and to register, please visit: http://www.banffcentre.ca/bnmi/events/refresh/ Leonardo will be publishing a selection of papers. This collaboration is part of the Leonardo Pionniers and Pathbreakers Art History Project. For more details see http://www.olats.org
From: Paul Brown <paul@PAUL-BROWN.COM>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:20:07 +0100
Call for Papers Do we have an Image Problem? Performance and Media Art caught between Art History and Visual Culture Studies. The first Media Art Conference in Osnabrück will take place from the 15th to the 17th of May 2006 as a three-day specialist symposium at the University of Osnabrück and is sponsored by Department of Kultur- und Geowissenschaften. It will be held immediately following the 19th European Media Art Festival (EMAF, 10th to 14th May 2006), one of the largest media art events in Europe. The conference will focus on the growing affinity between art forms produced, experienced and distributed by the media on the one hand and the highly debated iconic or pictorial turn on the other. One of the central issues will be to question whether the recently developed aesthetic terminology can sufficiently deal with the time- and action-oriented art forms of performance and media art. In addition to a number of distinguished experts invited to present papers, the speakers will include young scholars as well as contributors selected on the basis of the abstracts they submitted to this call for papers. Enclosed you will find further information concerning the background and objectives of the conference. Please do not hesitate to ask us questions at any time. We would be very pleased to include you among the speakers or authors for our planned publication. Topics for Talks and Articles 1. Performance and media art in the context of the contemporary debate between art history and Visual Culture Studies and where art history is positioning itself in relation to Visual Culture Studies, Media Studies and Cultural History. 2. Media art, art history’s cultural orientation and the scientific modus operandi given the wide range of methodologies and the overlap of genres. 3. Examples of art historical and media studies descriptions and analysis of performance and media art. In addition to a description of content, the abstracts for papers (c. 400 words) should clearly demonstrate both their relevance to the theme of the conference and their originality. A publication of the conference findings is planned. All contributions will be considered. Please submit your abstracts by 30 October 2005 to the EMAC office: Media Art Conference Osnabrück http://www.media-art-conference.com Universität Osnabrück Fachbereich Kultur- und Geowissenschaften Kunstgeschichte Katharinenstraße 5 49069 Osnabrück Germany Juniorprofessor Dr. Slavko Kacunko (Organisation) skacunko@uni-osnabrueck.de Priv. Doz. Dr. Habil. Dawn Leach (Organisation) dr.leach@kunstakademie-duesseldorf.de Björn Brüggemann (Büro) bjbruegg@uni-osnabrueck.de Phone: +49 (0)541 969-6041 Fax: +49 (0)541 969-4103 Reference-Text The first Media Art Conference in Osnabrück will direct attention to timely questions confronting art history, in particular the multimedia aspects concerning the production, critical appraisal and dissemination of performance and media art. Thus the following aspects will be addressed: · art history’s repositioning itself in relation to Visual Culture Studies, Media Studies and Cultural history · the development of a modus operandi which takes into consideration a wide range of methodologies and the interpenetration of different genres · the description and analysis of media art in the face of the instable status of the work concept in Media Art, and art in general The key issues to be addressed by the first Media Art Conference in Osnabrück can be summarised by the following question: Given the increasingly complex demands which the wide range of visual, media, critical, performance, cultural and gender studies exert on the teaching and research environment, how can the history of art maintain its ability to deal aptly with representations, new media and art and simultaneously incorporate interdisciplinary strategies? By focussing on time- and action-oriented art forms, the traditional discourse will be broadened to include the following questions: Can an (inter)active beholder play an integral role in the making of a work of art without jeopardising its intrinsic artistic value or reducing the “autonomy of the work of art” to a mere attribute? Where exactly do performance and media art fit into the already inflated body of terminology for denoting images? A glance at the large number of university graduates dealing with art and visual culture (Berlin, Frankfurt, Karlsruhe, Basel) documents the current popularity of the image-discourse. Similarly, the flood of specialist literature in recent years as well as related conferences (e.g. Art Historians Day, Bonn 2005) confirm this trend. If we take a look at the origins of performance and media art in the 1960s and 1970s and the subsequent development of the iconic/pictorial turns, the suspicion arises that recent efforts to expand the boundaries of art history to absorb current visual culture occurred in part to circumvent the challenges posed by these new art forms. By investigating art forms which defy traditional definition while exploring the definitions themselves, this conference will attempt to graft these two ambivalent discourses. At the same time it will lay the foundations for a reinterpretation of the relevant academic fields. An impressive series of arguments presented by artists, art historians and experts in media studies address the need to conjoin these conflicting fields of study.
From: Joseph Nechvatal <joseph_nechvatal@HOTMAIL.COM>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:43:26 +0000
Review of Nicolas Schöffer Exhibition at Espace EDF Electra 6, rue Recamier 75007 Paris Tel: 01 53 63 23 45 Until September 11th, 2005 By Joseph Nechvatal If one discounts the existence of László Moholy-Nagy’s Bauhaus Light Space Modulator (1923-30) (rebuilt in 1970 and now in the collection of Harvard University's Busch-Reisinger Museum) – a visionary multimedia artwork that helped inaugurate the artistic dialogue between machines, light, shadow and motion - there is something to the claim that the Hungarian-born French artist Nicolas Schöffer (1912-1992) is 'the Father of Cybernetic Art'. At the very least this premise may now be entertained while viewing actual work (mostly mobile sculpture under theatrical lighting effects) and an incredible amount of documentation now on view in Paris at the museum of the French electricity company Espace EDF Electra. What is immediately evident in this exceptional historic presentation is that Schöffer’s career touched on painting, kinetic sculpture, architecture, urbanism, film, TV, and even music (he collaborated with Pierre Henry) – all in the pursuit of a dynamism in art which was originally initiated by the Cubo-Futurists and then intensified and solidified by the Russian Constructivists such as Naum Gabo, Anton Pevsner, Moholy-Nagy and Ludwig Hirschfeld-Mack. All were concerned with opening up the static three-dimensional sculptural form to a fourth dimension of time and motion, and this was Schöffer’s intention as well. Schöffer however, coming well after, benefited pleasingly from cybernetic theories (theories of feedback systems (interactivity) primarily based on the ideas of Norbert Wiener (1894-1964)) in that they suggested to him artistic processes in terms of the organization of the system manifesting it (e.g., the circular causality of feedback-loops). For Schöffer, this enabled cybernetics to elucidate complex artistic relationships from within the work itself. His CYSP 1, from 1956, is considered the first cybernetic sculpture in art history in that it made use of electronic computations as developed by the Philips Company. The sculpture is set on a base mounted on four rollers, which contains the mechanism and the electronic brain. The plates are operated by small motors located under their axis. Photo-electric cells and a microphone built into the sculpture catch all the variations in the fields of color, light intensity and sound intensity. All these changes occasion reactions on the part of the sculpture. Consequently Schöffer’s kinetic sculptural compositions were able to parallel Warren McCulloch's adaptation of cybernetics in formulating a creative epistemology concerned with the self-communication within an observer's psyche and between the psyche and the surrounding environment. This is cybernetics’ primary usefulness in studying the supposed subject/object polarity in terms of artistic experience. That is the theoretical premise, at least. In actuality we are treated here to dramatic light shows (some on the trippy side) that come whirling out of his spinning mechanical metal sculptures. Colored lights bounce off revolving polished metal towers - casting ever-changing lights and shadows onto huge wall screens and into our eyes. There also is a very basic interactive room consisting of a group of smaller whirling sculptures which respond to the presence of a viewer and a large prismatic triangle structure containing infinity views. This work brought to mind Lucas Samaras, Room 2 and other mirrored immersive works such as Getulio Alvani’s Cubic Environment and Luc Peire's Environment – all of which similarly offered the viewer a pervasive reflective arrangement where mirrored surfaces rebound amplitude to an indefinite degree. In Schöffer’s triangular structure, my image was being ceaselessly mixed and reflected within spinning lights as I was made to feel an integral part of an exploding expanse. In general, this infinity experience bided me to view myself in infinity and so to feel space not in the traditional passive Euclidean custom - but in a conceptually operative and viractual (viractive) manner. In addition, the exhibition demonstrates Schöffer’s three period styles. First is his “spatio-dynamic” constructions from 1948 on: attempts at a synthesis of spatial and dynamic elements. Next come the “lumo-dynamic” constructions of 1957, which connect light projections to music. In his “chrono-dynamic” works of 1959, word and tone, movement and space, light and color form together a totality of space-time. Also well documented is Schöffer’s 52 metres high “Cybernetic Tower” from 1961, which was constructed in Liege with 66 revolving mirrors. Given the period-piece nature of the exhibition, I found it stylistically engaging - and not overly retro looking. Indeed, the show surprisingly did not appear that dated, even though of course it recalled the early Paris 60’s and the futuristic 'space age' designs of Paco Rabanne which involved the use of moving metallic discs or plates. Yet my subject/object polarity never shifted much. But given that, shouldn’t Nicolas Schöffer work be considered something other than an art object per se? Perhaps it is more appropriate to think of it as a means of transforming static perspective vision into a luminous motion study. We might just as well consider it then as stage props. Or better, an apparatus for painting with light. With his video works of 1961, Schöffer is additionally regarded as an early representative of video art – so perhaps it all funnels into special effects broadcast TV (which he did). For me, the final interest of this show (which I have seen three times now) is in its allowing me to better position Schöffer in a certain art-tech artist-engineer intellectual history – a living history which has not yet exhausted itself. Indeed it is touching to consider that László Moholy-Nagy’s Light Space Modulator – which was driven by a motor and equipped with 128 electric bulbs in different colors - was finally demonstrated at the 1930 Paris Werkbund exhibition. So we see Nicolas Schöffer here not only as a pioneer of cybernetic art, kinetic sculptor, town planner, architect and theoretician of art - but as a key player in the middle of the art-tech intellectual narration – a narration which increasingly defines artistic achievement in the beginning of the 21st century. Joseph Nechvatal http://www.nechvatal.net -:*:-.,*:-.,_,-:*:-.,*:-.,_,-:*:-.,*:-.,_,-:*:-.,*:-.,_,-:*:-.,*:-.,_,-:*:-.,*:-.,_,-:*:-.,*:-.,_,-:*:-.,*:-.
From: Paul Brown <paul@PAUL-BROWN.COM>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:00:00 +0100
interzone: Media arts in Australia a new book by Darren Tofts Media arts have become the most public and accessible form of inquiry into the interface between society, culture and technology. The impact of digital technologies has been profound and new disciplines of inquiry have emerged over the last twenty years in response to the overall "computerisation" of society. Media artists are at the forefront of this inquiry in both their use of new media and their aesthetic exploration of its effects. interzone presents the first comprehensive overview of the development of media arts culture in Australia. It critically discusses the work of established and emerging media artists and the contexts out of which their work has developed. interzone explores, through the work of more than 70 artists, the emergence of key concepts such as interactivity, interface and immersion. It is wide-ranging in its attention to aesthetic forms that have developed in relation to computer-based media, such as net art, virtual reality environments, digital video, multimedia installation and interactive fiction. interzone will be published in November by Thames & Hudson Australia. NOTE: a flyer with a special discount offer is attached. The phone and fax numbers supplied are in Australia - if you are phone/faxing from elsewhere replace 03 with +613 -- =============================================================== Paul Brown in the UK 16 July - end October 2005 mailto:paul@paul-brown.com http://www.paul-brown.com UK mob +44 (0)794 104 8228 USA fax +1 309 216 9900 =============================================================== Visiting Professor - Sussex University http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/ccnr/research/creativity.html ===============================================================